So does our experience after amnesty was granted in the Immigration Reform and Control Act of and illegal immigration burgeoned. And if the economy continues to slow down, then the impact of such factors will be all the greater. Still, to many Americans, amnesty in some form seems reasonable. People who have lived and worked here for a prolonged period of time, established businesses, and raised families do build up compelling claims on the rest of us, especially since we have not seen fit to enforce our immigration laws more rigorously.
Yet standing on equally moral ground, Texas Sen. But what we need here is a lot less high-mindedness, on all sides, and more realism—including some backlash insurance. In the immigration law, amnesty was counter-balanced by sanctions against businesses that hire illegals, which unfortunately were never adequately enforced. Perhaps stiffer, more meaningful employer sanctions should be put on the table now. Or maybe we should talk about reviving the alien registration program, which required aliens to verify their addresses by mailing a postcard to the federal government every January, a law the Reagan administration allowed to expire in the early s.
But some sort of reasonable demands should be placed on amnesty beneficiaries to reassure the American public that immigration is not out of control, and that those who have jumped the queue are not simply being rewarded. Such demands need not be punitive. For example, mandatory English-language classes, which immigrants need and which most Americans would be happy for them to take, could become part of such a deal.
If we were really serious about our immigration problems, we would shelve amnesty, which sends the wrong signals to everyone—immigrants, their advocates and immigration opponents. Instead, we could address specific problems facing illegals without directly confronting their legal status, which amnesty necessarily involves. For instance, we could grant reduced, in-state tuition at public universities to otherwise eligible applicants who are illegals.
None of this would make illegals legal. We would have to continue to live with the ambiguity of having all these illegal immigrants in our midst. But the alternative of amnesty would only make matters worse. If, however, there is to be an amnesty, then the American public needs to feel that it is getting something in return. Right now, the deal that is looming is one between immigrant advocates and unions on the one hand, and employers—especially agricultural employers—on the other.
Ultimately, the law allowed about 2. That bill would have created a year pathway to citizenship while also allocating billions of dollars to tighten border security.
Edward Alden, the Bernard L. Citizenship Act has a better chance in my view of allowing many undocumented immigrants to legalize and to avoid the growth of a new undocumented population, like that which occurred after IRCA. Published: Updated: Fact check: Are border crossings up because Biden stopped deportations, wall construction? Our ethics policy for PolitiFact journalists. Increase Text Size Print this story.
Congress that would allow undocumented foreign citizens to apply for permanent residence. Cancellation of Removal A remedy called Non-LPR Cancellation of Removal allows non-citizens who have already been placed in removal deportation proceedings to ask the judge to grant a green card, provided that they have been living "continuously physically present" in the U.
DACA There is a program temporarily in place providing for the deferred deportation of certain people who came to the U. Future Amnesty Possibilities The chances of an upcoming amnesty or path to a green card depend on the U. Talk to a Lawyer Need a lawyer? Start here. Practice Area Please select Zip Code. How it Works Briefly tell us about your case Provide your contact information Choose attorneys to contact you.
Immigration Law. Immigration Law Basics. Getting a Visa, Green Card or Asylum. Getting a Green Card. Becoming a U. Family Sponsors Petitioning for Immigrants.
0コメント